![]() This map was constructed using ConceptDraw MINDMAP 6, using icons and objects from ConceptDraw PRO 8. This methodology is believed to have a positive impact on the thinking process.Äownload the ConceptDraw 6 Hats mind map template created on the basis of the principles laid out by Edward DeBono in his book, "Six Thinking Hats". Typically a project will begin with an extended white hat action, as everyone gets "on the same page" creating a shared vision of the issue being addressed. Having identified the six states that can be accessed, distinct programs can be created using a developed sequences of hats which encompass and structure the thinking process toward a distinct goal. With his use of case studies and real examples of his methodology, DeBono describes the 6 Thinking Hats as: The premise of the method is that the human brain thinks in a number of distinct ways which can be identified, deliberately accessed and hence planned for use in a structured way allowing one to develop strategies for thinking about particular issues. 195.138.71.In the book "Six Thinking Hats", Edward DeBono demonstrates how we can all become better thinkers by using deliberate role-playing. And current speedy is just a persecution from Hu12, who deleted all other Conceptdraw articles, even approved by other admins and blocked my account and all accounts of my colleagues. This page was deleted twice and was twice restored by administrators, because it's notability and neutrality.MuZemike 17:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Reply A full-featured project management solution with all the necessary functions right at your fingertips. Creates mind maps that intuitively illustrate your thought process. A versatile, yet easy-to-use tool for organizing ideas and data. It looks like notability has now been firmly established with most of the content already cleaned up to make it sound more encyclopedic. A world-class diagramming platform that lets you display, communicate, and present dynamically. I went ahead and moved it back into the mainspace.I remain of the opinion that this article is an advertisement, especially given the sole author's conflict of interest.It's good to feel that you aren't alone. :) CSOWind ( talk) 05:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC) Reply Thank you for your advices and support.Hobit ( talk) 17:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Reply I'd not at all be surprised if it ends up at AfD again, but I think you've got enough good sources to survive now. If they think the sourcing is acceptable, you can then move it into mainspace. I'd suggest you wait for the DrV to end and then contact the closing admin asking him/her to review the article as it stands. ![]() I personally think you've got enough now (if just), but my bar for inclusion is generally lower than others.CSOWind ( talk) 09:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Reply They are about early versions but it points that the software is long enough on market and has some reputation. Hobit ( talk) 13:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Reply It still might get back to AfD, but if it has their okay, it should avoid any speedy attempts. ![]() ![]() That's mainly to avoid a speedy deletion on the basis of being "largely recreated". If you can find one more review that counts as a reliable source, I'd go back to the closing admin (or whoever did the userfication) and ask their blessing on the article before you move it back into mainspace. The source I suggested was a good one in the AfD looks like a republished PR piece too. The rest are either blogs (though some looks fairly professional and if it could be shown the authors were agreed to be experts in their fields they might count, I'd go to the reliable sources noticeboard ) or pretty clearly PR pieces that got republished ( is pretty plainly such a case as is ).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |